Plevna, MT population, income and ZIP codes

Plevna town is a very small community in Montana, with 280 residents counted in the Census American Community Survey 2019-2023 ACS 5-year estimates, which places it #210 of 497 ranked by population — larger than 57% of them. The median age here is 15.8 years against 39.1 nationally, a distinctly younger profile, typical of places with students, military posts or a fast-growing family population. At this population the ACS sample is small, so the margin of error around every dollar figure below is wide — treat the numbers as a band, not a point, and expect them to move between annual releases without the place itself changing.

Households in Plevna town earn a median of $73,750 a year, 6.1% below the national figure of $78,538 and 17% above the $62,992 median for the 94 Montana cities we cover. This figure covers the household, not the worker: two people on ordinary wages at one address outrank a single professional in the same table. Poverty reaches 8.9% of residents here, below the 12.4% national rate.

The typical owner-occupied home in Plevna town is valued at $304,300, essentially level with the national figure and 21% above the $250,900 peer median, while median gross rent runs not published a month. The home-price-to-income ratio works out to 4.1×, against roughly 3.9× nationally, so buying is harder here than in the average US market. 67.7% of occupied homes are owner-occupied versus 65% nationally, so the market leans toward owners. Gross rent folds in the utilities a tenant pays separately, so it is closer to the real monthly outlay than a headline rent figure.

A median age of 15.8 means a large student or early-career population; income medians in places like this understate household resources, since many residents are supported from outside the address. With 280 residents, a handful of survey responses moves every median on this page. Compare Plevna town against its county rather than against national figures.

The Census withheld gross rent for Plevna town because the sample was too thin to publish at this geography. Those values were suppressed at the source, not lost in our dataset, and we do not model a replacement. Everything else on this page comes straight from the ACS 2019-2023 ACS 5-year tables.