Judith Gap, MT population, income and ZIP codes

Judith Gap city is a very small community in Montana, with 131 residents counted in the Census American Community Survey 2019-2023 ACS 5-year estimates, which places it #293 of 497 ranked by population — larger than 41% of them. The median age here is 60.9 years against 39.1 nationally, a markedly older profile that usually tracks retirees staying put and younger households leaving for work. At this population the ACS sample is small, so the margin of error around every dollar figure below is wide — treat the numbers as a band, not a point, and expect them to move between annual releases without the place itself changing.

Households in Judith Gap city earn a median of not published a year. Household income here is measured before tax and pooled across everyone at the address, which is why it reads higher than typical individual earnings in the same area. Poverty reaches 32.8% of residents here, well above the 12.4% national rate, which is the single clearest signal in this dataset that median income here is carried by a narrow band of households.

The typical owner-occupied home in Judith Gap city is valued at $106,500, 64.9% below the national figure and 58% below the $250,900 peer median, while median gross rent runs $525 a month, 62.7% below the national figure, or roughly $6,300 across a full year. 77% of occupied homes are owner-occupied versus 65% nationally, so the market leans toward owners. Gross rent folds in the utilities a tenant pays separately, so it is closer to the real monthly outlay than a headline rent figure.

A median age of 60.9 puts Judith Gap city well into retirement-weighted territory, which pulls median household income down even where household wealth is high, because retirement draws are counted differently from wages. With 131 residents, a handful of survey responses moves every median on this page. Compare Judith Gap city against its county rather than against national figures.

The Census withheld household income for Judith Gap city because the sample was too thin to publish at this geography. Those values were suppressed at the source, not lost in our dataset, and we do not model a replacement. Everything else on this page comes straight from the ACS 2019-2023 ACS 5-year tables.