Darlington, MO population, income and ZIP codes

Darlington village is a very small community in Missouri, with 35 residents counted in the Census American Community Survey 2019-2023 ACS 5-year estimates, which places it #1011 of 1,082 ranked by population — larger than 6% of them. The median age here is 41 years against 39.1 nationally, a slightly older profile than the country as a whole. At this population the ACS sample is small, so the margin of error around every dollar figure below is wide — treat the numbers as a band, not a point, and expect them to move between annual releases without the place itself changing.

Households in Darlington village earn a median of $18,125 a year, 76.9% below the national figure of $78,538 and 67% below the $55,543 median for the 374 Missouri cities we cover. The median is the midpoint household, not an average, so a handful of very high earners cannot drag it upward the way they distort a mean. Poverty reaches 22.9% of residents here, well above the 12.4% national rate, which is the single clearest signal in this dataset that median income here is carried by a narrow band of households.

The typical owner-occupied home in Darlington village is valued at $22,500, 92.6% below the national figure and 85% below the $152,400 peer median, while median gross rent runs not published a month. The home-price-to-income ratio works out to 1.2×, against roughly 3.9× nationally, so purchase prices are unusually low against local pay, the pattern in places where supply is plentiful and wage growth has been flat. 64.7% of occupied homes are owner-occupied versus 65% nationally, so the market leans more heavily on renters. Gross rent folds in the utilities a tenant pays separately, so it is closer to the real monthly outlay than a headline rent figure.

With 35 residents, a handful of survey responses moves every median on this page. Compare Darlington village against its county rather than against national figures.

The Census withheld gross rent for Darlington village because the sample was too thin to publish at this geography. Those values were suppressed at the source, not lost in our dataset, and we do not model a replacement. Everything else on this page comes straight from the ACS 2019-2023 ACS 5-year tables.