Hough, OK population, income and ZIP codes

Hough CDP is a very small community in Oklahoma, with 21 residents counted in the Census American Community Survey 2019-2023 ACS 5-year estimates, which places it #808 of 846 ranked by population — larger than 4% of them. The median age here is 60.5 years against 39.1 nationally, a markedly older profile that usually tracks retirees staying put and younger households leaving for work. At this population the ACS sample is small, so the margin of error around every dollar figure below is wide — treat the numbers as a band, not a point, and expect them to move between annual releases without the place itself changing.

Households in Hough CDP earn a median of $38,750 a year, 50.7% below the national figure of $78,538 and 28% below the $53,500 median for the 240 Oklahoma cities we cover. This figure covers the household, not the worker: two people on ordinary wages at one address outrank a single professional in the same table. Poverty reaches 0% of residents here, less than half the 12.4% national rate.

The typical owner-occupied home in Hough CDP is valued at $160,400, 47.1% below the national figure and 28% above the $125,800 peer median, while median gross rent runs not published a month. The home-price-to-income ratio works out to 4.1×, against roughly 3.9× nationally, so buying is harder here than in the average US market. 73.3% of occupied homes are owner-occupied versus 65% nationally, so the market leans toward owners. The rent line includes utilities paid by the tenant, a definition worth remembering when comparing it against a landlord's quoted rate.

A median age of 60.5 puts Hough CDP well into retirement-weighted territory, which pulls median household income down even where household wealth is high, because retirement draws are counted differently from wages. With 21 residents, a handful of survey responses moves every median on this page. Compare Hough CDP against its county rather than against national figures.

The Census withheld gross rent for Hough CDP because the sample was too thin to publish at this geography. Those values were suppressed at the source, not lost in our dataset, and we do not model a replacement. Everything else on this page comes straight from the ACS 2019-2023 ACS 5-year tables.