Lake Tekakwitha, MO population, income and ZIP codes

Lake Tekakwitha village is a very small community in Missouri, with 210 residents counted in the Census American Community Survey 2019-2023 ACS 5-year estimates, which places it #726 of 1,082 ranked by population — larger than 32% of them. The median age here is 49.9 years against 39.1 nationally, a markedly older profile that usually tracks retirees staying put and younger households leaving for work. At this population the ACS sample is small, so the margin of error around every dollar figure below is wide — treat the numbers as a band, not a point, and expect them to move between annual releases without the place itself changing.

Households in Lake Tekakwitha village earn a median of $52,500 a year, 33.2% below the national figure of $78,538 and 5% below the $55,543 median for the 374 Missouri cities we cover. The median is the midpoint household, not an average, so a handful of very high earners cannot drag it upward the way they distort a mean. Poverty reaches 4.3% of residents here, less than half the 12.4% national rate.

The typical owner-occupied home in Lake Tekakwitha village is valued at $104,800, 65.5% below the national figure and 31% below the $152,400 peer median, while median gross rent runs not published a month. The home-price-to-income ratio works out to 2×, against roughly 3.9× nationally, so purchase prices are unusually low against local pay, the pattern in places where supply is plentiful and wage growth has been flat. 98% of occupied homes are owner-occupied versus 65% nationally, an owner-dominated market where rental listings are scarce and rent medians rest on a thin sample. The rent line includes utilities paid by the tenant, a definition worth remembering when comparing it against a landlord's quoted rate.

With 210 residents, a handful of survey responses moves every median on this page. Compare Lake Tekakwitha village against its county rather than against national figures.

The Census withheld gross rent for Lake Tekakwitha village because the sample was too thin to publish at this geography. Those values were suppressed at the source, not lost in our dataset, and we do not model a replacement. Everything else on this page comes straight from the ACS 2019-2023 ACS 5-year tables.