Utica, KS population, income and ZIP codes

Utica city is a very small community in Kansas, with 119 residents counted in the Census American Community Survey 2019-2023 ACS 5-year estimates, which places it #527 of 740 ranked by population — larger than 28% of them. The median age here is 32.3 years against 39.1 nationally, a distinctly younger profile, typical of places with students, military posts or a fast-growing family population. At this population the ACS sample is small, so the margin of error around every dollar figure below is wide — treat the numbers as a band, not a point, and expect them to move between annual releases without the place itself changing.

Households in Utica city earn a median of $65,703 a year, 16.3% below the national figure of $78,538 and 3% above the $63,750 median for the 200 Kansas cities we cover. Median household income counts every pre-tax dollar arriving at an address — wages, self-employment, Social Security, pensions, interest and public assistance — for everyone living there, so multi-earner households pull the figure up even where individual pay is modest. Poverty reaches 9.2% of residents here, below the 12.4% national rate.

The typical owner-occupied home in Utica city is valued at $37,500, 87.6% below the national figure and 71% below the $131,300 peer median, while median gross rent runs not published a month. The home-price-to-income ratio works out to 0.6×, against roughly 3.9× nationally, so purchase prices are unusually low against local pay, the pattern in places where supply is plentiful and wage growth has been flat. 71.6% of occupied homes are owner-occupied versus 65% nationally, so the market leans toward owners. Rent is reported gross — contract rent plus tenant-paid utilities — which is why it runs above the advertised price on a listing for the same unit.

With 119 residents, a handful of survey responses moves every median on this page. Compare Utica city against its county rather than against national figures.

The Census withheld gross rent for Utica city because the sample was too thin to publish at this geography. Those values were suppressed at the source, not lost in our dataset, and we do not model a replacement. Everything else on this page comes straight from the ACS 2019-2023 ACS 5-year tables.