Rose Hill Acres, TX population, income and ZIP codes

Rose Hill Acres city is a very small community in Texas, with 313 residents counted in the Census American Community Survey 2019-2023 ACS 5-year estimates, which places it #1423 of 1,863 ranked by population — larger than 23% of them. The median age here is 42.5 years against 39.1 nationally, a slightly older profile than the country as a whole. At this population the ACS sample is small, so the margin of error around every dollar figure below is wide — treat the numbers as a band, not a point, and expect them to move between annual releases without the place itself changing.

Households in Rose Hill Acres city earn a median of $86,500 a year, 10.1% above the national figure of $78,538 and 34% above the $64,654 median for the 1,008 Texas cities we cover. Median household income counts every pre-tax dollar arriving at an address — wages, self-employment, Social Security, pensions, interest and public assistance — for everyone living there, so multi-earner households pull the figure up even where individual pay is modest. Poverty reaches 7% of residents here, below the 12.4% national rate.

The typical owner-occupied home in Rose Hill Acres city is valued at $224,400, 26% below the national figure and 25% above the $179,100 peer median, while median gross rent runs not published a month. The home-price-to-income ratio works out to 2.6×, against roughly 3.9× nationally, so buying is easier here than in the average US market. 93.1% of occupied homes are owner-occupied versus 65% nationally, an owner-dominated market where rental listings are scarce and rent medians rest on a thin sample. Rent is reported gross — contract rent plus tenant-paid utilities — which is why it runs above the advertised price on a listing for the same unit.

With 313 residents, a handful of survey responses moves every median on this page. Compare Rose Hill Acres city against its county rather than against national figures.

The Census withheld gross rent for Rose Hill Acres city because the sample was too thin to publish at this geography. Those values were suppressed at the source, not lost in our dataset, and we do not model a replacement. Everything else on this page comes straight from the ACS 2019-2023 ACS 5-year tables.