Ideal, GA population, income and ZIP codes

Ideal city is a very small community in Georgia, with 648 residents counted in the Census American Community Survey 2019-2023 ACS 5-year estimates, which places it #456 of 675 ranked by population — larger than 32% of them. The median age here is 41.9 years against 39.1 nationally, a slightly older profile than the country as a whole. At this population the ACS sample is small, so the margin of error around every dollar figure below is wide — treat the numbers as a band, not a point, and expect them to move between annual releases without the place itself changing.

Households in Ideal city earn a median of $24,219 a year, 69.2% below the national figure of $78,538 and 58% below the $57,300 median for the 378 Georgia cities we cover. This figure covers the household, not the worker: two people on ordinary wages at one address outrank a single professional in the same table. Poverty reaches 51.5% of residents here, well above the 12.4% national rate, which is the single clearest signal in this dataset that median income here is carried by a narrow band of households.

The typical owner-occupied home in Ideal city is valued at $53,000, 82.5% below the national figure and 72% below the $191,600 peer median, while median gross rent runs $643 a month, 54.3% below the national figure, or roughly $7,716 across a full year. A household on the local median income would put about 31.9% of gross pay toward that rent against the federal 30% cost-burden threshold, so renting here is a stretch on median earnings. The home-price-to-income ratio works out to 2.2×, against roughly 3.9× nationally, so purchase prices are unusually low against local pay, the pattern in places where supply is plentiful and wage growth has been flat. 48% of occupied homes are owner-occupied versus 65% nationally, so the market leans more heavily on renters. The rent line includes utilities paid by the tenant, a definition worth remembering when comparing it against a landlord's quoted rate.

Ideal city is the unusual combination of expensive to rent and cheap to buy: rent takes 31.9% of median income while homes cost only 2.2× it. Where that pattern shows up, the gap is normally down to down-payment and credit barriers rather than price. With 648 residents, a handful of survey responses moves every median on this page. Compare Ideal city against its county rather than against national figures.

All values below were released by the Census for this exact geography, with no gap-filling on our side. Small-area estimates still carry wider margins of error than state or national figures, so check the linked ACS tables before relying on them for lending, appraisal or legal work.